Tax The Rich More, They Can Afford It.

It’s a common catch cry among low-income earners and those on social welfare.

In a strong vibrant economy there’s no doubt those earning above average incomes have a duty to pay a commensurate amount of tax.

But if you keep going to the well, it will  eventually run dry.

I’m not talking about the seriously rich here, just those earning two or three times the average wage.

As we all go through life each increase in income is soaked up by a bigger house, better car, private schooling etc. It’s a reasonable dream and aspiration in a bountiful country like Australia.

The proposed flood levy skewed to take a much bigger grab from middle and upper income earners highlights how this taxpaying group is seen as ripe pickings .

However, those calling for a “rich tax” please consider this.

I was talking to a business aquaintance, someone who would be considered well off by average standards, He claims  his above average income is committed, Yes he has a bigger house for his family of 6, but a lot of his income is taken up by private school fees.There’s not a lot of fat, he’s not salting large amounts away every pay day.

When asked what he would do if  something like the flood levy became permanent he already had his plan mapped out.

“Well firstly we wouldn’t be eating out two or three times a week.”

“I’d cut the gardener who comes once a fortnight.”

We might have to do without a cleaner once week ,everyone might need to do their own ironing.”

And the movies might not be a weekly family event.

A “rich” family slugged but who is hurting?

If this story is typical and other middle income earners make similar cutbacks, the restaurants would have to cut staff, the gardeners would be out of a job, as would the cleaners and ironing ladies.

And the movie houses would have lots of empty seats.

So tax the “rich” if you will but look at  the potential “knock on” effect.

Those people who had been earning income  from “the above average earning family” would possibly  have to fall back on social welfare.

Instead of paying tax they’d become be a burden on the tax system.

Those who earn more should pay more tax – no argument – but tampering with our tax structure for a quick fix could have long- lasting and harmful effects on our economy.

Nobody wins.

2 thoughts on “Tax The Rich More, They Can Afford It.

  1. charlierobinson

    so so agree with this. these taxes arent a slug “at the rich”, they are a slug at “middle class australia”. the people who work bludy hard to make a go of providing a better life for themselves and their surrounding family.

    and we constantly target them.

    why do they make the starting point $50k? because it’s just over the welfare line. why is the next point $100k? because it’s a professional who wont complain out of the professionalism of their job and workplace to do the right thing.

    Why do we need to send out kids to private education? because we cant get government/public schooling right.


    thankyou for your thoughts and work in the communty xc

    1. Belinda

      here here Graham and Charlie – so agree – I have debts much higher than the person who earns under 50K, so why assume any further tax/levy won’t affect me??? Assuming only makes an ass out of u and me…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s